News

FuelEU Maritime – Compliance steps for Shipping Operators

FuelEU Maritime – Compliance steps for Shipping Operators

FuelEU Maritime is a pivotal regulation aimed at decarbonizing the maritime industry, aligning with the EU’s overarching climate objectives. This guide provides advanced insights and specific operational details essential for shipping companies to ensure compliance effectively and strategically plan their operations.

Objective of FuelEU Maritime

The FuelEU Maritime Regulation, as outlined in Regulation (EU) 2023/1805, aims to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of maritime fuels, thus contributing to the EU’s goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050. This regulation mandates the use of low-GHG fuels and zero-emission technologies to meet prescribed GHG intensity limits.

Scope of the Regulation

FuelEU Maritime applies to ships above 5,000 gross tonnage (GT) engaged in commercial activities and calling at ports within the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA). It covers both intra-EU voyages and voyages between EU ports and non-EU ports.

Key Provisions:

  1. GHG Intensity Limits: Ships must comply with specific GHG intensity limits, measured in grams of CO2 equivalent per megajoule (gCO2 eq/MJ), based on energy used on board. This is calculated using reported fuel consumption and emission factors.
  2. Onshore Power Supply (OPS): Containerships and passenger ships are required to connect to shore power or utilize zero-emission technology while at berth in EU/EEA ports from 2030.
  3. Monitoring and Reporting: Ships are required to monitor fuel consumption and other relevant data according to their FuelEU Monitoring and Reporting Plan and submit an annual report to an accredited verifier.

1. Treatment of Ships Sold During the Reporting Year

According to FuelEU Maritime Regulation (EU) 2023/1805, specific provisions address the treatment of ships sold during the reporting year to ensure accurate monitoring and reporting of fuel consumption and GHG emissions. These provisions ensure that both the previous and new owners are held accountable for their respective periods of ownership.

When a ship is sold during the reporting period, the regulation outlines specific steps to handle the data and compliance obligations. According to Article 15, Paragraph 4 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1805:

  • Notification by Transferring Company:

The company transferring the ship must notify the verifier of the information referred to in Paragraph 1 for the time during which it operated the ship. This notification should include all relevant data on fuel consumption, GHG emissions, and any other required metrics for the period the ship was under its operation.

  • Verification and Recording:

The information provided by the transferring company must be verified and recorded in the FuelEU database by the verifier who performed verification activities for the ship under the transferring company. This process should be carried out as close as practical to the transfer date and must be completed no later than one month after the transfer.

  • Responsibility of New Operator:

The company responsible for the ship’s operation on December 31 of the reporting period will be responsible for the ship’s compliance with the requirements for the entire reporting period, even if there were multiple transfers during that time. This ensures continuous compliance and accurate reporting throughout the year, regardless of changes in ownership.

Example Scenario

Consider a ship that is sold on June 30 within the reporting year:

  • Previous Owner:
    • The company that operated the ship from January 1 to June 30 must compile all relevant data on fuel consumption and GHG emissions for this period. They are required to notify the verifier with this information promptly.
    • The verifier must then verify this data and record it in the FuelEU database by July 31.
  • New Owner:
    • The company that takes over on July 1 is responsible for monitoring and reporting data from this date until December 31.
    • Even though the new owner only operated the ship for part of the year, they must ensure compliance with all FuelEU Maritime requirements for the entire reporting period, consolidating data from both ownership periods.

By adhering to these provisions, the regulation ensures that the ship’s fuel consumption and GHG emissions are accurately tracked and reported, maintaining regulatory compliance throughout any ownership transitions.

Compliance Obligations

When a ship is sold during the reporting year, the responsibility for monitoring, reporting, and verifying (MRV) fuel consumption and GHG emissions is divided between the previous and new owners based on their periods of ownership. Each owner must ensure the completeness and accuracy of the data for their respective ownership periods.

Reporting Requirements

Both the previous and new owners must submit detailed reports covering their ownership periods. These reports must include:

  • Fuel consumption data
  • GHG emissions
  • Compliance with GHG intensity limits
  • Any operational specifics relevant to the reporting period

Example:

Consider a ship sold on June 30th within the reporting year:

  • Previous Owner/manager: The previous owner is responsible for monitoring and reporting data from January 1st to June 30th. They must ensure all data is complete and accurate for this period and submit it to an accredited verifier.
  • New Owner/manager: The new owner takes responsibility from July 1st to December 31st. They must monitor and report data for this period and ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements.

Impact: By dividing the reporting responsibilities, both owners are accountable for their respective periods, ensuring comprehensive and accurate data submission for the entire reporting year. This method maintains the integrity of the monitoring and reporting process and ensures compliance with FuelEU Maritime regulations.

Benefit: This approach provides a clear framework for handling ship ownership changes within the reporting year, reducing the risk of non-compliance due to data gaps or inaccuracies. It ensures that the ship’s GHG emissions and fuel consumption are accurately recorded and reported, maintaining regulatory compliance, and avoiding potential penalties.

2. Biofuel Blends Allocation

Ships engaged in international voyages and utilizing renewable and low-carbon fuels throughout their journey can allocate these fuels in the GHG intensity calculation for the corresponding reporting period. According to FuelEU Article 10, all renewable and low-carbon fuels that meet the relevant criteria can be considered as contributing to half of the energy used during these international voyages. This allocation is allowed up to the maximum energy amount specified under FuelEU Maritime Article 2(1)(d). This provision also applies to similar fuels used in voyages arriving at or departing from ports located in outermost regions under the authority of a Member State, as per FuelEU Article 2(4).

While fuel consumption must be reported on a “per voyage” basis, the average yearly GHG intensity of the energy used onboard is calculated based on the total mass of fuel consumed per energy consumer annually.

Examples:

  1. Bio-blend B30 (30% biodiesel + 70% fossil diesel): The entire biodiesel fraction can be counted towards covering the energy used during an international voyage.
  2. Bio-blend B60 (60% biodiesel + 40% fossil diesel): A portion of the biodiesel fraction can be counted towards covering the energy used during an international voyage, up to the maximum energy amount allowed under the regulation.

3. Benefits of Electric Propulsion

Under the FuelEU Maritime regulation, ships utilizing electric propulsion systems, especially those powered by renewable energy sources, can achieve significant advantages in meeting GHG intensity targets. Electric propulsion systems are recognized for their potential to deliver zero GHG emissions during operation, which directly contributes to compliance with GHG intensity limits and can reduce the need for derogations related to Onshore Power Supply (OPS) requirements.

Compliance and Efficiency

Electric propulsion systems eliminate the emissions associated with conventional fuel combustion, thereby offering a straightforward pathway to achieving zero-emission voyages. This not only facilitates compliance with the stringent GHG intensity thresholds set by FuelEU Maritime but also positions ships favorably for future regulatory changes aiming for even lower emissions.

Operational Flexibility

Electric propulsion provides operational flexibility, allowing ships to switch to zero-emission operations, particularly in emission control areas (ECAs) and when berthed in ports that require OPS connections. This flexibility is crucial for maintaining compliance with both current and anticipated future regulations.

Example:

Consider a ship equipped with a hybrid propulsion system that can switch between conventional fuel engines and electric propulsion powered by onboard batteries charged with renewable energy sources:

  • Scenario: The ship operates on conventional fuel for long-haul international voyages but switches to electric propulsion when entering EU/EEA ports and while berthed.
  • Impact: During the periods of electric propulsion, the ship records zero GHG emissions, significantly lowering its overall GHG intensity for the reporting period.
  • Benefit: This approach ensures that the ship remains well within the GHG intensity limits, reduces the need for derogation, and avoids potential penalties for non-compliance. Additionally, it provides operational cost savings by reducing fuel consumption and associated emissions costs.

By leveraging electric propulsion, shipping operators can effectively align with the FuelEU Maritime’s regulatory framework, ensuring compliance while also benefiting from enhanced operational efficiency and sustainability.

Derogations and Flexibilities

  • Unavailable Onshore Power Supply (OPS):
    • Ships are exempt from the requirement to connect to OPS if the berth they are at does not have an available OPS connection.
  • Insufficient or Unstable Power Supply:
    • Ships can claim derogation if the power supply from OPS is either insufficient to meet the ship’s energy requirements or is unstable, potentially causing operational issues.
  • Technical Incompatibility:
    • Derogations are granted if there is a technical incompatibility between the ship’s systems and the OPS infrastructure at the port, making it impractical to connect.

Specific Technical Derogations

Ice Class Ships

Ice class ships, specifically designed for operation in icy waters, may be exempt from certain regulatory requirements due to their unique operational and structural characteristics. These vessels typically have more robust propulsion and hull structures, which impact their energy efficiency and GHG intensity. Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 provides specific exemptions and adjustments for these ships to account for their additional energy consumption:

  • Energy Consumption Exemptions:
    • For ice classes IC, IB, IA, or IA Super (or equivalent): Companies may request, until 31 December 2034, to exclude the additional energy consumption due to sailing in ice conditions.
    • For ice classes IA or IA Super (or equivalent): Companies may request to exclude the additional energy consumption due to the technical characteristics of the ship.
  • Calculation of Adjusted Mass of Fuel for Ice Navigation:
    • The regulation provides formulas for calculating the additional energy consumption and the adjusted mass of fuel for compliance calculations.
    • Adjustments account for energy consumed due to both the technical characteristics of the ice class and the energy used while navigating in ice conditions.

Safety or Navigation Issues

Ships may claim derogation if connecting to Onshore Power Supply (OPS) poses risks to the safety of the ship, crew, or port infrastructure, or if it interferes with the ship’s navigational capabilities.

Operational Requirements

Ships engaged in operations necessitating continuous power for essential equipment that cannot be supported by OPS are eligible for specific exceptions outlined in Regulation (EU) 2023/1805. Paragraph 5 of Article 6 details the following concessions:

  1. Short Mooring Duration: Ships moored at the quayside for less than two hours are exempt from using OPS.
  2. Zero-Emission Technologies: Ships using zero-emission technologies for all electrical power demand at berth are exempt.
  3. Unscheduled Port Calls: Derogations can be claimed for unscheduled port calls due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the ship’s control.
  4. Unavailability of OPS: If OPS connection points are unavailable in a port, ships can claim this derogation.
  5. Electrical Grid Stability: Ships are exempt if the shore power is insufficient to meet the ship’s electrical demand at berth.
  6. Incompatibility: If the shore installation is not compatible with the onboard OPS equipment, provided the onboard installation meets the technical specifications in Annex II of Regulation (EU) 2023/1804.
  7. Emergency Situations: Onboard energy generation is allowed under emergency conditions posing an immediate risk to life, the ship, or the environment.
  8. Maintenance and Testing: When connected to OPS, ships may use onboard energy generation for necessary maintenance or functional tests.

These exceptions ensure that ships can maintain essential operations when OPS is not feasible or available.

Limits on Derogations

  • Maximum Allowable Derogations:
    • The total number of derogations related to OPS connection is limited to a maximum of 10% of the ship’s total port calls during the reporting period. Alternatively, if the ship makes fewer port calls, the derogation limit is set at 10 port calls for that period.

Penalty Calculations for Non-Compliance

Penalties for non-compliance under the FuelEU Maritime Regulation are calculated based on specific criteria to ensure deterrence and enforce compliance. The penalties cover various aspects of non-compliance, including GHG intensity, RFNBO sub target, OPS requirements, and consecutive non-compliance periods.

1. Non-Compliance with GHG Intensity

Penalties for non-compliance with GHG intensity are determined by the excess GHG emissions relative to the required intensity. The penalty calculation is detailed in Article 23 and Annex IV of Regulation (EU) 2023/1805.

  • Penalty Formula:

  • Example: If a ship’s actual GHG intensity exceeds the limit by 5 gCO2 eq/MJ over 10,000 MJ of energy used, the penalty would be calculated to emphasize the necessity of strict compliance.

2. Non-Compliance with RFNBO Sub target

For compliance deficits concerning the RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin) sub target, the penalty is calculated as follows:

  • Penalty Formula:

The compliance balance for RFNBO (CBRFNBO) is divided by 41,000 and then multiplied by the price difference (Pd) to determine the penalty amount as referred to in Article 23(2).

3. Non-Compliance with Onshore Power Supply (OPS) Requirements

Penalties for non-compliant port calls regarding the use of onshore power supply (OPS) are based on the ship’s electrical power demand at berth and the duration of non-compliance.

FuelEU Penalty (OPS) = Total Electrical Power Demand x Total hours at Berth in Non-compliance x Average Electricity Price in Union x 2

Details: The penalty is proportional to the cost of using the electricity and is designed to have a dissuasive effect against the use of more polluting energy sources. This is expressed in a fixed amount in EUR, based on the average electricity price in the Union for non-household consumers, multiplied by a factor of two to account for additional charges related to providing the service, including connection costs and investment recovery elements.

4. Increased Penalty for Consecutive Non-Compliance

If a ship has a compliance deficit for two or more consecutive reporting periods, the penalty amount is increased to enforce compliance.

  • Penalty Formula:

where n is the number of consecutive reporting periods.

  • Explanation: This formula ensures that the penalty for repeated non-compliance is progressively harsher, thereby removing any economic advantage of continued non-compliance and promoting adherence to regulations.

These penalties are intended to be stringent and dissuasive, ensuring a level playing field in the maritime sector and driving compliance with the FuelEU Maritime Regulation.

Reporting Requirements

Ships must submit an annual report, verified by an accredited verifier, which includes:

  • Detailed fuel consumption data.
  • GHG emissions.
  • Compliance with GHG intensity limits.
  • OPS usage and any invoked derogations.

This report must be comprehensive to avoid discrepancies that could lead to non-compliance penalties.

Exemptions and Special Cases

Certain ships, such as those engaged in non-commercial activities (e.g., military vessels), are exempt. Additionally, voyages not involving EU/EEA ports are excluded from the regulation’s scope, providing some relief for specific operational routes.

Normec Verifavia’s Expertise

Normec Verifavia has been at the forefront of emissions verification since 2018. Accredited by COFRAC under ISO 17029 and by UKAS for UK MRV, we have verified emissions for over 2,000 ships for over 300 companies across 40 countries under various regulations, including EU ETS, EU MRV, UK MRV, IMO DCS, CII and FuelEU Maritime. Our extensive experience ensures that we deliver the highest standards of transparency and reliability in GHG emissions verification.

Conclusion

Ensuring compliance with FuelEU Maritime demands a thorough understanding of detailed regulatory provisions and advanced compliance strategies. By leveraging our expertise, shipping companies can navigate these complexities effectively, ensuring both compliance and operational efficiency. Normec Verifavia for comprehensive verification services to ensure your fleet remains compliant with the latest maritime regulations.